How Can a Small Business Get on Wikipedia?

Now celebrating its tenth year online, Wikipedia exists as both a highly popular reference source and a current news media outlet. Many people view having their own Wikipedia article as evidence of credibility for themselves and their work. Not surprisingly, many small businesses are eager to see themselves on Wikipedia. But getting your company on the site can be difficult and stressful.

“Many years ago, we had tremendous success advising clients on Wikipedia listings that drove highly targeted traffic,” says Kent Lewis, president of Anvil Media in Portland, Ore. “In one particular case, we created significant amounts of content around their industry – useful information that provided value from an objective perspective – which was embraced by Wikipedia. Unfortunately, when our case study was published by MarketingSherpa, a reader alerted the Wikipedia editors and they immediately deleted the client’s page, related pages, and then systematically worked down our client list and removed any other client-related pages (even though we hadn’t touched most of them).”

So how can a small business get itself included in the Wikipedia article mix? Gregory Kohs, a Philadelphia-based research practitioner with a Fortune 100 company who also consults with individuals and organizations about Wikipedia, offers several somewhat controversial tips. Be advised, as Kohs explains it, getting your business on Wikipedia is not an endeavor for the faint of heart.

“Create an account from a new IP address not tied to your identity – don’t try this at home or at the office,” he says. “A perfect spot is the public library or the corner coffee shop with Wi-Fi access. Build up a reputation for authentic, altruistic editing contributions – you’ll want to constructively edit at least ten different articles over several days, not directly related to your ultimate self-promotional article topic.

“Then, have your article fully prepared in advance, complete with properly formatted reference citations, and include an information box to lend the topic an aura of credibility,” he continues. “Over the course of about 30 to 45 minutes, you should publish small sections of the prepared article, piece by piece, so it looks like you’re really working on this thing as a ‘knowledge-sharing’ process. Then, continue to work on two or three other unrelated articles. Then wait – don’t announce your new Wikipedia article in a blog or press release, and don’t encourage your employees or friends to go check it out. If someone asks you about your Wikipedia article, say, ‘Oh, fancy that!’”

Of course, there is also the possibility that someone else will write about you. Antero Alli, founder of the Berkeley, Calif.-based publishing and production company ParaTheatrical Research, was pleasantly surprised to find himself as the subject of a Wikipedia article – although he takes it with the proverbial grain of salt.

“My Wikipedia page has served as a kind of generic bio that has been useful on occasions when I want to impress someone with the broader range of what I do and have done,” he says. “But it’s still odd. When I look at it and read it, it’s as if I’m reading the story of someone who has already died. I mean, don’t you have to die first before getting listed in an encyclopedia?”

But is Wikipedia a worthwhile target for small business marketing? Lewis views the site with mixed feelings.

“Wikipedia does not help increase organic search rankings, but having a neutral or positive profile can help manage your reputation in search results – credible content on a credible site tends to rank well,” he says. “So if a company can prove it is ‘culturally relevant’ according to the Wikipedia trolls, and they participate actively and regularly on Wikipedia as an editor/contributor and follow the rules, then they may have an opportunity to generate highly targeted traffic. Unfortunately most small companies do not fit this criteria and are better off sticking to proven online marketing strategies: search engine marketing, search engine optimization, and pay-per-click advertising.”

Kohs, for his part, runs an alternative free site called MyWikiBiz, which allows people and enterprises to fashion their own Wikipedia-style content without facing the editorial chaos that often surrounds internal Wikipedia operations. “It’s not just free web hosting,” he says of MyWikiBiz. “It is pay-yourself web hosting.”

For more on Wikipedia, please see our follow-up story.

About Phil Hall

Phil Hall is a financial journalist and public relations/marketing specialist based in Connecticut.
This entry was posted in Marketing, Social Media and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest
Tomas_Seb 5 pts

I agree with one of the comments below that small businesses shouldn't force their way onto Wikipedia using Koh's techniques. Koh's techniques are ideal for a larger company, but in reality, using a company such as WikiExperts or http://www.wizardsofwiki.com. These companies offer ethical editing solutions, and have used both of them for editing and management for our large company.

 

We don't think under any circumstances is this unehtical. Wikipedia can damage our brand, simply due to its position on our search results. Secondly people wrongly accept Wikipedia information as not just factual, but the complete truth. In reality it sometimes isn't. 

 

Small businesses creating articles by themselves, is just going to create extra work for the editors and admins of Wikipedia. They'll have to delete numerous articles that simply aren't upto the standard.

It is absolutely essential to retain a neutral tone when writing your Wikipedia entry hence it makes sense to have a third party do it for you.

I think this article does bring up the issue that the current process is flawed. While I won't advocate violating Wikipedia's rules, "notable" is a subjective requirement. Given that Wikipedia's current contributors are 85% male (and likely white, under 35 and Western) we're getting a skewed picture to begin. That's how we get entries for Jesse Draper, aka The Valley Girl hostess but not Silicon Valley Moms Blog.

As a small businessman (freelance writer), Wikipedia volunteer administrator and occasional Intuit product user myself, I find your willingness to nurture Kohs' "how to commit fraud in order to fake up your firm" advice rather appalling.Most small businesses are not notable. Period. End of discussion. By design, Wikipedia is not a directory of the planet's small businesses; it is an encyclopedia of content derived from reliable sources.On those rare occasions when small businesses are notable, somebody else ought to be writing about them.Public relations, self-publicity, spamming, SEO and the like are just forms of vandalism of Wikipedia, and are treated in closely similar ways to other forms of vandalism. Failure to observe Wikipedia standards can and does taint the reputation of the spammer, and has frequently been known to get "contributors" blocked and even banned.

Chris Null, now that the "10th anniversary" celebrations have concluded at Wikipedia, might we expect soon that rebuttal and counterpoint to this story?

In response to the ongoing problems associated with maintaining a presence on Wikipedia we at Telesperience uncovered whilst talking to our telecoms and IT market contacts (see Is Wikipedia discriminating against tech firms? - http://www.microsperience.com/?p=1200) we are now running a wiki project to enable companies and consultants who work in technology fields to provide a wiki presence at our project Wikisperience (http://www.wikisperience.com) The project was designed to provide an outlet for businesses who are not being adequately served by the processes at play on Wikipedia and we would be happy to talk to representatives of technology companies (especially in the telecoms sector and data quality, MDM, data integration and business intelligence markets) about setting up a wikisperience profile for their company.

As a note to readers, Kohs' comments are his own and are not necessarily the opinion of Intuit, its management, or its editorial staff. We understand and agree that Kohs' advice is controversial and not necessarily in line with Wikipedia policy, however his primary point is well-taken: It is extremely difficult to get your business listed on Wikipedia... and some dedicated businesses may wish to take exhaustive steps to make that happen. We are currently reaching out to Wikimedia directly for a rebuttal and counterpoint, and for the organization's advice on how a small business can get listed on the site while obeying the sometimes unclear rules of Wikipedia. Stay tuned.-Chris N., Intuit Small Business Blog Editor

There are errors of fact in each of the preceding comments.The Wikipedia "Sockpuppets" policy expressly makes an exception where privacy is a concern for an individual editing an article within his/her professional circle. If their online identity is traceable to their real-world identity, they may wish to use an alternative account to avoid real-world consequences from their editing or other Wikipedia actions in that area. That's not just my advice, that's Wikipedia's own policy.The notion that Gregory Kohs is "banned from all Wikimedia projects" is also an outlandish presentment of falsehood, given that editor "Thekohser" has been recently active (and welcomed) on Wikimedia Commons, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and Wikisource -- all Wikimedia projects that do not share the Byzantine governance structure of Wikipedia. As for this scare tactic that a business will have "its online reputation destroyed", I suspect most Intuit readers can recognize the difference between a reasoned and experienced professional's approach to Wikipedia, versus that of a zealot who breathlessly wishes to maintain a corrupt balance of power against well-meaning businesses.

Intuit appears to have been taken in by a fast-talking conman. Mr Kohs is banned from all Wikimedia projects for this sort of behaviour. A business following his recommendations will find its online reputation as destroyed as if it started sending spam, for the same reason.

Wikipedia officially despises Gregory Kohs' advice to create a "sock puppet": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:SOC

Trackbacks

  1. [...] use. If you would like to be sure that the bond between you and also reduces hunger and burn it for all those boys out there won’t be another date; this practical to use when your successfully skilled in [...]

  2. [...] Washington University show that various kinds of advertisements evoke different amounts of brain activity depending on whether or not they use elements of logical persuasion or non-rational influence. Reporting in the [...]